-
-
-
-
Boardman generally produce a MTB that gives you more bang for buck and because of brand snobbery are more affordable, I don't think they've made a bad one yet.
Quality in SUS forks at that price would be Rockshox Reba in good order that have been serviced, hold air and have no wear on the stanchions. Generally avoid Suntour. Nice would be Shimano drive train and brakes. More likely is SRAM and Avid. -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Rocket Ron Protections are a good balance of speed and grip. Not very different from X kings though. I've not tried Ralphs on a 29er but they might work better than on a 26er where I found them rear only and sketchy on anything not bone dry. Also not tried Thunderburts.
I'd go protection version every time. Actually I think X kings in black chilli are as good as Rons and probably what I am moving to as I've had a lot of training punctures on Rons. Your pressures do sound a bit low but weight, carcass strength, line choice and rims are all factors
BTW there is an internet legend that Contis come with mould release agent on the side walls that interferes with latex sealing. Supposedly if you wipe the inside down with alcohol or similar it helps the sidewalls seal.
-
-
-
Theoretically possibly but I had fairly low but realistic aims for it which was to improve training efficiency by working to power zone not HR, track fitness changes and to analyse race performance. As the measurement is on my visibly weaker side I am encouraged to try to make that leg less of a passenger and I can notice the effect of trying to improve pedal technique etc.
Thus far the unit is allowing me to achieve those 3 aims on my training bike and race bike so I'm happy even if my legs aren't.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Time for kitten killing - 29er HT = significant comfort improvement to the extent FS much less needed. This aged wreck managed to do 2 x 13hr races on some pretty rough terrain on a 29er HT without wanting FS.