-
-
-
Really Foxy?
The argument for clues is very simple - without one the game is simply Do you happen to recognise this? Not a very interesting game if you don't. And most of the time most people aren't going to be able to go and get the tag - it's too far away, they are busy, the in-laws are staying. But you can still play the game, try to find the tag, even if you are not going to go and get it - but only if there is some way of finding it other than recognising it.
And every frigging tag is easy if you know it! -
-
'Sticky toffee pudding'. That was always a regular feature of Skully's birthday parties. It wasn't a dessert, not any kind of foodstuff, and the recipient was rarely, if ever, grateful or, indeed, able to form a coherent sentence for days after.
'Bangers and mash' was another treat that guests might look forward to. Again, it had nothing to do with traditional British cooking. You probably don't even want to think about Skully's idea of a 'full English'.But, however spiteful, malicious and intricately cruel his parties were you would always leave with a smile on your face and you can't say fairer than that.
-
Passing on this message from my boss:
Dear Prospective Hackney Cycle Instructor
We are looking to expand the Hackney pool of cycle instructors for 2014-15. if you would like to be considered, please read the attached invite together with the job description and person spec, and send me an email explaining how you fit the criteria we are looking for. I’ll get back to you by email, inviting you to come along to an informal interview here in Hackney.
We will be interviewing the week beginning 24th March 2014, with a view to starting work after the Easter break.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards
Pat
Pat Gannon
Cycle Training Manager
Health and Community Services
020 8356 6594
pat.gannon@hackney.gov.uk
www.hackney.gov.ukI've not included the job description or spec. It is mainly working in Primary schools. Contact Pat if you are interested.
-
Will, can we have your weekly Walking Dead review?
Well, since you ask. Warning: contains spoilers!
This week was a bit like the two-handers that Eastenders sometimes do. But rather than be locked in a pub our two - the TV redneck who is a real life fashion model and, erm, one of Hershel's surviving daughters, I can't remember her name, very pale, very slight, prettier than average (obviously), likes to wander off on her own and get attacked (obviously) - anyway, these two get stuck in an abandoned house drinking moonshine.
That's a bit of a spoiler because, well, that was the entire plot. No, really, that was it. They burned the house down at the end with no regard to the likelihood of them also burning down the forest just meters away from the building, or that this meant they were outside after dark in an area full of walker-zombies, but that made so little sense it was hardly worth mentioning.It was all about the past, or the present, possibly the future, either way it was blah-blah-blah for an hour until even one of Rick's now-I'm-doing-my-serious-acting bits would have been a mercy. You couldn't help feel sorry for Hatbeard who must have been screaming at the screen.
On the upside it looks like Maggie will be back next week. It's probably too late to track down this series' producer and arrange an ironic crossbow-related death.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-






Yeh but imagine you're doing 70 on the motorway with your eyes closed and a group of feral children, lurking in the bushes, rush out and just stand there like they own the road. You brake but not hard enough and two of the young ruffians are given quite a fright. Who's responsible then? Ultimately I think we have to blame the parents, both of the children and of the driver and ultimately beyond that we have to look at society as a whole.