-
-
-
-
-
-
@MM & BB
I'm confused, as are many fellow tossers out there... Arguably that's our problem, but if there is no real consensus within the organisation combined with the fact that LCC simply can't communicate their views in plain language in order for the average village idiot to understand them, what hope in hell have we got of putting cycling campaign at the forefront of the political agenda, be that in London or the country as a whole, let alone the Houses of Parliament?
I withstand that Scoble is kinda right - may the Lord have mercy on my soul - it does seem... kinda, seem and kinda being the keywords, that LCC is set on segregation, thus the catchy "mix where possible, segregate where necessary" motto. The question is, where exactly is it possible to mix, and where is it necessary to segregate? And please don't expect me, or anyone else for that matter, to attend an LCC meeting in order to understand.
"Ceterum censeo Ed Scoble esse delendam."
PS@MM
Please not that the term "apartheid'" was crossed out. -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
"Pity it seemed that LCC it dead set on segregation or nothing."
"The LCC is NOT dead set on segregation or nothing. That's an over-simplification of a very complex policy area."
I hear you Bill, I haven't got a fucking clue where LCC stands, but I hear you.
Scoble is kinda right though, it seems like LCC is dead set on segregation, seems being the key word... Please trust me, agreeing with Ed doesn't come easy, in fact the mere thought is making my physically ill. So please tell me he's wrong. Or better yet in straight forward easy to understand layman's terms for those of us not able and willing to spend our entire life ploughing through LCC policies and proposals, where exactly do LCC stand in terms of
road apartheidsegregation?"Ceterum censeo Edscobli esse delendam."
-
-
-



Is that a trick question?