-
-
-
Because distracted people in cars are able to do much more damage that a distracted person on a bike (Though riding or driving with an music is not necessarily distracting if the person compensates for the loss of hearing)
Ah - I had forgotten that we had decided to redefine dangerous as being active, and not passive.The article makes not mention of being distracted though, unless I missed something?
-
...and riding with an ipod is not as dangerous as listening to music in a car perhaps
http://rideons.wordpress.com/2012/07/09/an-ear-on-the-traffic/
But there's nothing in that article that mentions danger at all (other than a link to a website discussing safe decibel levels for your hearing itself).Where do you get this conclusion about riding with an ipod being less dangerous than listening to music in a car?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
And yesterday his legal team missed the deadline for filing a response to the court in Texas by 2nd August because they fucked up the 14 day deadline and were given until midnight Friday instead of the extension till Monday they asked for.
Simples - Lance never doped, it's just that his lawyers were late in filing a response to the latest vicious slur on his most-tested-in-the-world-ever name. -
-
-
Meme: triathletes can't ride bikes
Example cracking me up at the moment: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/19125189
1:24 seems like some pretty slick handling.Saying that - I've piled it on that corner in the wet before - It's a terrible surface.
-
-
-




Is the lion wearing headphones?