-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
You mean Voluntary Reading Help? Surely not so secretive that it needs a PM?
-
-
-
doesn't a slow cooker essentially destroy all the vitamins etc?
The answer to that is complicated. High temperatures are more destructive to most nutrients than low temps, but then prolonged exposure to heat compared to short exposure, well, it depends. The amount of liquid will affect it and so on. Slow cooking makes palatable tough cuts of meat that would otherwise not be eaten, so how do you figure that in?
Get the recipe right and it's not a problem.
-
Oh, and I have no idea where the Coach & Horses or the Bread and Roses are - any ideas which one we're meeting at?
The Bread and Roses is in Clapham. Coach and Horses is in Brixton but right on the edge of Clapham.
Coach and Horses are happy to let us have the upstairs room next Monday, so I've provisionally booked it. Bread and Roses wasn't available next Monday but could be in the future, with notice.
-
We can all be Hatbeard's: http://www.firebox.com/product/4719/Original-Beard-Hats
Wearing one of those makes us his property?
Bearded slavery >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
-
-
-
-
**You guys are getting really het up about what was actually less than 5% of the people attending. **What about everyone else? Do the majority not matter because these particular people are on television and therefore more important than the other 300+ attendees? **By giving these select few individuals undue importance you are just reinforcing the culture of celebrity
**^This.
-
why tho?
it's not like it wasn't bound to happen and im sure the good folks that organise it deserve some sort of reward for their troubles, if someone wants to throw sackfulls of cash at someone for organising something a lot of people seem to enjoy then why the fuck not?
Because when people were having a lot of fun arsing about in tweed, with no sponsor, it felt cool. When exactly the same thing is done by some other people, who mostly don't give a fuck about the sponsor - who knows, maybe those people don't like the implication by association that they were being (gasp) hipsters and not just friends having fun (as if the two are mutually exclusive). Much more convenient to say it's all gone downhill. After all, they were wearing tweed before it was cool...
-
-
-
-
No, it isn't. It's reasonably accurate for the vast majority of people. It fails for professional athletes (who have usually have much better resources to hand in any case), body builders (who don't give a shit what the average person weighs), non-professional but keen athletes/body-builders, the very young, the very old and the seriously ill. For almost everybody else, it's a useful metric.
You decided to become active, you're enjoying the benefits but one of the drawbacks is the added complexity in determining a healthy weight and diet regimen. Fair enough, but it doesn't justify dissing the BMI. Most people who do that are in denial. You aren't in that category, I'm sure, but they don't need your support.