-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
On a website far away, somebody started yet another discussion about historical accuracy and cultural sensitivity in Assassin's Creed. I conjured up the idea of Ubisoft making "Assassin's Creed: Princess Diana" to illustrate a point, and now I really wish they'd make that game. A French games company tainting the memory of the blessed saint? Reform and the Tory gutter press would go mental.
-
you don't half spend a lot of time picking rows on here!
No, I don't. Since the result came in, you've been treating even the mildestly expressed disagreement -or even request for clarification - as a personal attack, and responding with the bile you mistakenly imagine is being directed at you, so I do not think your judgement on this is sound.
Unsubscribing for the sake of my mental health. Please just leave me alone.
-
etc.
Etc. including Israel/Gaza. American politics being what it is, there's not a stance they could have taken that wouldn't have hurt them on one side or another. Which does suggest they might as well have been a lot braver on that issue than they were, of course. If you're going to lose, lose with some pride.
-
-
-
After every election, a lot of people use the result to justify all their theories about pretty much everything, usually without doing the legwork to provide some evidence of how much it contributed to the result, or was relevant at all. Just a lot of shouty venting. "I told you so" is what they're all saying, but this person making it the title of their post really doesn't endear them to me.
I can read through that and be thinking "Maybe. Seems true. Probably relevant." and then I get to
They really seemed to think that people wouldn’t notice what was right in front of them, or maybe they simply didn’t care.
And all I could say to the author would be "Grow the fuck up, you ranty child." I mean, I'm pretty sure Biden's people didn't think that and did care, but it would be a waste of time trying to say that to them.
I could make a list of the specious arguments, but
But ‘democracy is on the ballot’ is an incredibly antidemocratic slogan.
Is a fucking corker of nonsense, and I don't have the energy to reread the rest.
-
-
-
he was indicted in federal and state courts
"Politically-motivated harrassment and abuse of power by the Democrats" (Even some Democrat politicians are embarrased by at least one of the New York cases)
He was found liable in a civil court in case relating to a sexual assault
"Clinton got away with it. The elite media made excuses for him and sneered at the victim" (This is true and shameful, regardless of the fact that Republicans are hypocrites on this issue)
Another court levied massive fines on his business empire
"More persecution."
"And yet he's still a successful billionaire. He really is good at this."
"He even told us that he understands corruption because he's seen enough of it in business. How honest is that?"
It's also worth remembering that "He may have been formally elected but he's not my president" is something Democrats started back in 2000. It went around and it came around.
-
-






