-
Spot on
Maybe not.
Let us move the discussion of reasonableness of law to something closeer to our hearts, say chaining a bike up.
All Daily Mail readers know what odious and inconsiderate people cyclists are, so there should be a law that bikes cannot be chained up where they are a "hazard" or a "danger" to innocent, law abiding pedestrians.
Now that the law is on the statute books, where can we chain our bikes, and be sure to be lawful? What if some irate pensioner pushes the bike over, and the next passer by cuts their leg?
Not as emotive as, say, Starbucks management charges, but I am not so sure we, as a community, would be happy with such "common sense" approaches to an ever present danger on our streets.
-
-
I understand, and to a large extent agree, that the solution is improving statute.
That is not to alter the fact that in our society there is a hierarchy of jobs -
Very valuable - eg the people who staff our hospitals and teach our kids
'Normal' - eg people who sweep the streets and man our shops.
Parasitic scum - eg lawyers and accountants whose job is to find loopholes, who make money by defying the will of the people by exercising their right to spend their time thinking about the letter of the law and not the spirit. When such lawyers and accountants are dealing with commercial matters / contracts then there is an argument that they are not doing much harm, but when they are fucking with the spirit of criminal law and taxation it is fucking immoral, IMHO.
It is sometimes said that our views on taxation are a mirror to the face of hypocracy.
You "must" pay your taxes, but I "should" pay my taxes. Whether these be based on millions in an offshore trust, or a bit of Ebay trading, it is always easier to see the the fault in fellow citizen's fiscal morals, than in our own skewed thinking.
Taxation is an intrusion of the state, into the earnings of its citizens. There may be a greater good in the c.£7 billion that the Iraq/Afghanistan adventures have cost this nation, and that has been collected from citizens, but I am not convinced that there is a moral angle to taxation.
Let the law be clear, let people pay what they are due to pay, but in the words of the the leading tax case
*Every man is entitled if he can to arrange his affairs so that the tax attaching under the appropriate Acts is less than it otherwise would be. If he succeeds in ordering them so as to secure that result, then, however unappreciative the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or his fellow taxpayers may be of his ingenuity, he cannot be compelled to pay an increased tax” *(IRC v Duke of Westminster [ 1936 ] AC1 (HL)).
(Oh, and regretfully, I am not a lawyer, but maybe a little mildewed around the edges)
-
Sorry folks, but it looks like work demands will conspire against me.
Have a great ride.
A Hard Day In January
Saturday 26th, 9am — Berinsfield route- ian (conker)
- Hairnet
- Laner - rollapaluza cc
- tommmmmmm - rollapaluza cc
- steve
- YAL
- AirTime
- Amygdala
- vunugu + RP feeder
- Alex (zanda) + RP feeder
- esstee + RP feeder
A Hard Day In January
Saturday 26th, 10am — Marlow route
4.
- ian (conker)
-
I guess what clubman is saying is - "the reliability trial might have been canned, but if you didn't get out on your own, shame on you."
I feel suitably guilty.
I think Chris is too much of a gentleman to try and shame anyone, but it does show just how hard core a rider he is.
The ride in the story is epic but a polio sufferer with a calliper? Extraordinary.
-
-
-
-
I'm a member of DP. There was so much interest in joining last year that I think they've limited the number of weekends a month they do new joiner rides, it'd be good to check via the club website. http://www.dulwichparagon.com/
You may want to don sunglasses before visiting the site! Generally I've found the club helpful and very friendly. On occasion the group riding discipline leaves a bit to be desired, but I suspect that's because people are learning the ropes.
I certainly enjoy being a member, it's good to be able to go out and ride socially with an established group.
+1.
DP also organise reciprocal rights with Crystal Palace Tri, my club, so if you want to add some swim and run torture, to go with your road bike miles, the gateway to Hell is open and clearly sign posted.
-
-
-
-
-
I like to think of it as 'steady' rather than 'slow'. But, yes, I will be going slowly. Company would be great!
Humm, given your performance on the last Box Hill ride, I would classify you as being on the "animated" side of "Steady."
Will be driving to the start, with one spare place in the wagon, from the Brixton area.
First dibs, first served.
-
This ^
+1. Gone but not forgotten.
Whenever something really good is done by the forum, as a community, I always remember the rallying around done by a trusted few, and the debt of gratitude us old timers owe them, for being with Paul in his final hours of need.
Rest in peace mister, as you ride with the angels.
-
-
Oh hai !
I've been off the bike for a bit, but hope to see you drab wretched people in the morning. I'll be up late waiting for Santa with a bag of coke and some hookers so there is the faint possibility I'll oversleep.
What, another meeting with the FSA?
I thought they were closed 'till New Year...
-
-
-
-
-
-



I fear my point did not come across.
The reason commerial laws are detailed and complex, is that they try and formulate solutions for many "what ifs?" The problem with words like "reasonable" is that they need to be defined. My cycle analogy was aimed at showing, that whilst most forum members could not care less if tax regulations for multi-nationals are arbitrary, we would all be uneasy with being prosecuted for locking up our bikes, and falling foul of the "principle" of the offending (and imagined) legislation.
Therefore, tax legislation, aimed at maximising returns, being fair to all parties, and being consistent, must of its nature be wide ranging and complex. Simplistic stances such as "but you know what you should be doing" are more than a trifle naive, and loose sight of the fact that international business, have the choice of where to place themselves, and the amount of tax they pay in any isolated territory.