-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I'm very fond of David Hume's argument that we shouldn't believe in miracles, to wit:
Define a miracle as an event which occurs contrary to the laws of known science, such as somebody walking on water, or levitating.
Then consider how you get information about a putative miracle, such as seeing it, or someone telling you.
Then P1 is the probability of the miracle taking place, and P2 is the probability that the source of information you are relying on is faulty (ie whoever told you is lying or your eyes are fooling you).
Hume says, and I believe him, that P2 > P1 in all cases, almost by definition, since miracles are highly improbable.
If we apportion our beliefs rationally, we should always believe what is more probable in a given situation.
Ergo, we should always choose to believe that the miracle report is screwed up, or that our senses aren't working properly, over the belief that a miracle has taken place.
So, I'm afraid, Tynan has good, fat Scottish philosopher company.
'Miracles happen everyday, change your perception of what a miracle is and you'll see them all around you'
-Jon Bon Jovi
-
-
-
-
-
-
-




We can keep our fingers crossed that Witchcraft will send the Catholics packing
http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=22994