Search results for:

Again exactly!

Trust me, it wouldn't fit you chest wise. You'd roughly need 42".

You have a good eye...

Exactly

Originally Posted by Digger
I've put this in a new thread because Vee Vee's thread is from the past and people may not realise that we can have imput now.

Thanks to Cameleon for this:

removal of the congestion charge extension is going ahead. will result in more congestion, more pollution, more CO2, less cycling, less walking - according to tfl..

you can object here, before august 2nd..

Link here:

http://www.tfl.gov.uk/roadusers/cong...ing/15520.aspx

OP

.

^Ha!, beat me.

^ Welcome back, Beautiful people...

Euh... Hum... Er... How to say that in the right way...

Apologies for this dramatic post... my helmet was at work actually, which is why I could not find it at home this morning. And of course, because it was in a very weird location, I did not spot it when I arrived and then came here to ask if you guys had seen it...

Sorry again, false alarm...

Loic

When you posted, I could remember you turning up in the helmet and leaving without it, the power of suggestion, eh?

I didn't steal it Loic, honest. Actually, I've misplaced my helmet this week too. Must be catching.

Ed, where did you get to?

Is yours silver?

But not now?

Oh. rabbit rabbit...

Jack rabbit slim?

Hare here, here hare?

Originally Posted by Digger
I've put this in a new thread because Vee Vee's thread is from the past and people may not realise that we can have imput now.

Thanks to Cameleon for this:

removal of the congestion charge extension is going ahead. will result in more congestion, more pollution, more CO2, less cycling, less walking - according to tfl..

you can object here, before august 2nd..

Link here:

http://www.tfl.gov.uk/roadusers/cong...ing/15520.aspx

OP

The form for objecting has three boxes:
!.Please use this space to provide your views on the proposed removal of the Western Extension

1. Please use this space to give us your views on the other proposed Congestion Charge changes

2. Please use this space to provide any other comments you may have

Here are my objections, interested to here your comments....

1. It's disastrous to remove the Western Extension, it's a giant leap backwards, please don't do this and please try and encourage less use of motorised transport in the Capitol.

2. Good to increase the congestion charge, well overdue.

The other proposals (Replacing the Alternative Fuel discount with a new Greener Vehicle discount
Making changes to the Electric Vehicle discount
Introducing a new registration charge for 9+ seated vehicles) are all useful in helping people to value the ecological impact of their transport choices when considering investing in motorised transport, but in effect just give a way forward for them to increase the vehicle congestion, I think these are all valid and useful measures for London but should be separate from and unrelated to the congestion charge, we need to implement changes that will cause a modal shift away from personal motorised transport not to more personal motorised transport with a different fuel or bigger cars or ones that require more electricity to be generated...
So in short let's increase the congestion charge and have less congestion.

1. The introduction of the congestion charge was a bold and important move in one of the most influential cities on the planet, in order for it to maintain any effectiveness it must at least keep up with if not excede inflation to encourage changes in behaviour and attitudes.
   

.

I've put this in a new thread because Vee Vee's thread is from the past and people may not realise that we can have imput now.

Thanks to Cameleon for this:

removal of the congestion charge extension is going ahead. will result in more congestion, more pollution, more CO2, less cycling, less walking - according to tfl..

you can object here, before august 2nd..

Link here:

http://www.tfl.gov.uk/roadusers/congestioncharging/15520.aspx

OP

'Says Boris Johnson'

I rest my case

You rest your case, and that's in writing?

^thanks mate just going to quote scoble on that.

yea i would agree with this.

lol. small businesses in most cases have been really hard hit by this extension.

their livelihoods are more important than me wanting to feel safer riding my bike around. imo.

Not only about bikes and your feelings mate, 4,300 Londoners dead each year of poor air, the deaths, the injuries, the poor quality of life for us all, bigger issues involved and if we do manage to cut down on motorised road transport, then we will manage to move goods around, but maybe in a saner fashion...

Has this been resolved yet?

You can do it to the rhythm of a rock and roll band....

Or monogamy?

^is that the site you go on to say how you don't like swinging?

Lanes Fixed Gear and Swingers?

The form for objecting has three boxes:
!.Please use this space to provide your views on the proposed removal of the Western Extension

1. Please use this space to give us your views on the other proposed Congestion Charge changes

2. Please use this space to provide any other comments you may have

Here are my objections, interested to here your comments....

1. It's disastrous to remove the Western Extension, it's a giant leap backwards, please don't do this and please try and encourage less use of motorised transport in the Capitol.

2. Good to increase the congestion charge, well overdue.

The other proposals (Replacing the Alternative Fuel discount with a new Greener Vehicle discount
Making changes to the Electric Vehicle discount
Introducing a new registration charge for 9+ seated vehicles) are all useful in helping people to value the ecological impact of their transport choices when considering investing in motorised transport, but in effect just give a way forward for them to increase the vehicle congestion, I think these are all valid and useful measures for London but should be separate from and unrelated to the congestion charge, we need to implement changes that will cause a modal shift away from personal motorised transport not to more personal motorised transport with a different fuel or bigger cars or ones that require more electricity to be generated...
So in short let's increase the congestion charge and have less congestion.

1. The introduction of the congestion charge was a bold and important move in one of the most influential cities on the planet, in order for it to maintain any effectiveness it must at least keep up with if not excede inflation to encourage changes in behaviour and attitudes.
   .
   

I've put this in a new thread because Vee Vee's thread is from the past and people may not realise that we can have imput now.

Thanks to Cameleon for this:

removal of the congestion charge extension is going ahead. will result in more congestion, more pollution, more CO2, less cycling, less walking - according to tfl..

you can object here, before august 2nd..

Link here:

http://www.tfl.gov.uk/roadusers/congestioncharging/15520.aspx

OP for 2nd page...

I have a bike and a car, both shite to use in London

Have you tried London Pogo Stick and Tree Swingers?