-
-
-
-
-
-
It's the original fork for sure. The eyelets are original. I couldn't say about the drilling it is centred though.
The clearance at the back is the same as the front. The angles are pretty slack.
I'll build up a cheap set of riding wheels while I search for decent parts and old school tubs.
Thanks again for all the help, it's very much appreciated. -
-
-
ihatelaw why did you get pulled over under anti-terror legislation?
Who me? they wanted to do a S&S and didn't have to give me a reason other than it was for anti terror purposes. They were serious too, no numbers on the shoulders etc.
Nothing really has changed. Under PACE anytime they wanted to have a look in my pockets they just had to make something up.
-
-
-
-
-
pj (pj) the hole looks off centre.
So you think it may have came afterwards? I would agree if the eyelets weren't there. I think it's just the angle of the picture as the tyre was definitely in the middle in real life and isn't in the pic :)
Here is the rest of the frame with a 700c wheel in the back for reference.

-
I have an interesting issue. The A F Mills frame I bought on Friday was believed to be a 60s one by the seller. I thought I would bung a 700c (with 23 tyre) wheel in just to have a look how it sat and there is bugger all clearance on the fork. Seeing as this is drilled for a brake and has eyelets for guards am I right in thinking this is actually made for 26 inch wheels? If so wouldn't that make it 50s rather than 60s?

-
-
-
-
-
Cheers, now the search begins for the rest of the bits :)
The fellas further down who had the nice cloth bar tape were talking about me resto of the frame. I'm glad I saved it as I think re-painting something like that would be a crime.
On a different tip all together I liked that lo-pro frame with the 24 inch front wheel. Not something I'd ride much though :D
-
-
http://imdb.com/title/tt0110498/
The trivia section gives us this gem
"Principal photography was completed in just seven days."
lolz no shit.