Search results for:

stevo_com just out of morbid curiosity, how much would one pay for such a set up? the ergostem and paul lever are both out of my price bracket.

All told, it will cost me a little over a grand

russell a very 'british' fixed
french stem?
japanese bars?
american break lever?

  : )

we are a nation of mutts are we not ..?

its a LOOK ajustable stem for dialing in TT riding position, on the bareknuckle I suffer with numb hands anything over twenty miles, this set up is designed to find a riding position to eliminate that, also I like these stems, i think they are kinda cool

I just want to say that this forum and the people who post here are an absolute inspiration to me, this bike will look the bollox and *that is thanks to you lot *,so I suppose I owe you lot a pint...;)

a very 'british' fixed

skoota i am canadian BTW but i'm with mouse any excuse to call someone a 'fucktard' if only we could make it into a song...TYNAN???????

Oh what bad luck, nevermind eh ;)

you could have sanded that seatpost down by now and been out there riding

could you not just polish the post below the min insertion mark with emery paper I bet you have it fitted up in less than an hour and no-one is going to see below the insertion mark

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7edztkuz5o

We were doing all that 'shuffle' shite in London Town years ago - still I am impressed with the melbourne crew

they got some moves

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWdtZTbgXcM&NR=1

ere geezer,welcome to the 'hippy' melbourne shuffle

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8k5WtNRlBcE&feature=related

ever seen this is Oz..?

** The "movement" I talk about is to gain rights for cyclists to have safe bike lanes, educated drivers and more cyclists year round. it is a battle here**

This is what gets up my nose, these days I get drivers tooting and trying to push me off the road because they think I ought to be in the cycle lanes that people like this canadian geezer is fighting for. Yet anyone who rides a bike 'all year round' will tell you that it is in the cycle lanes that you have to be doubly alert because you have - NO ROOM TO MANEOUVRE - inevitably you have to go half the speed that you would normally be going out in the traffic.

I really object to people politicising cycling on my behalf all they are doing is forcing their ideas down my throat

Can we have a poll to BAN fucking CANADA

get rid of 'cycle lanes', 90% of the time they are more dangerous than the open road

** And when we as a society are trying to promote biking as a healthy, active alternative to driving, every time a bicyclist gets killed, it sets back the movement. **

What 'movement' ? I ain't part of your fucking 'movement', you don't speak for me, get the fuck out of my way

grrr

**The element of risk means that we strive harder to avoid it, and thus get caught out less often.

It's pissing with rain, and we know that skidding to a stop whilst gunning down from City Road is going to be tough, so we control our cadence and thus speed, expand our peripheral awareness, and stay on the look out for those open doors, hidden pot-holes and dumb-arse peds. Obvious really.**

Well I think that just about sums it up really the only thing I would add is that as counter intuitive as it may sound riding aggressively seems to be safer that riding passively.

|³|MA3K [quote]RPM [quote]|³|MA3K

It would be quite surprising to discover that that Mail-reading, white-van-man fuckhead who nearly killed you the other day can do shit-hot backwards circles and trackslide 30 meters.

all the better reason for people not to make stereotypical pre-judgements of the type you parody there

I've not tried to ride in backwards circles, but I do occasionally have to drive the company's van. and you know as well as I do that even some cycle couriers have done a stint in a van.

although regular cyclists probably have a better grasp of how to handle a vehicle and are less likely to knock you off[/quote]

I CAN parody the fuck out of the white-van-man fuckhead who nearly killed me the other day. I bet a million pounds he read the Mail too, and the Sun and the Star..[/quote]

this is so prejudiced, I mean, what makes you think the geezer can read..?

I love it, oh we are too 'posh' to read the Daily Mail, don't you know LittleJohn is right the country has gone to the dogs, thats why people like me don't live there anymore...;)

tennessee

The funniest was watching some blokes wig blowing off in the wind whilst he desperately tried to re-attach it to his head

Species is the 'accepted' way of catogorizing organisms by this reckoning you need two chickens to produce an egg if however you change the way you categorize your organism then you can obtain any result you hope for although it ought to be noted that sexual reproduction between species is a rather hit or miss affair so its best not to actually count your chickens before they have hatched

I'll get my coat...night

I think I must be a consequentialist too then, I probably won't mention it to the next copper who tugs me though, he might think I was being 'smart' or summit

Au contraire, organisms are defined by species, and a species is defined as a group of organisms capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring, therefore to have an egg you have to have chickens

tynan probably knows a way involving some glue, a shoelace and a ten pence piece, he is kinda handy like that...;)

It might not be that fast as I'd probably have to convert to catholicism first , shiva wouldn't care

*Hinduism does not view sin as a crime against God, but as an act against dharma - moral order - and one's own self. It is thought natural, if unfortunate, that young souls act wrongly, for they are living in nescience, avidya, the darkness of ignorance. *

Young at heart, eh

it was very serious thought provoking question, if you go through a red light and no -one sees, its like you never went through that red light at all