-
Dnipro are all counter attack all the time.
Dembele's done nothing much, Sandro has been all over the place, Eriksen looks like the man most likely to do something for us. But him drifting inside means we've got no width on the left and fryers isn't willing to charge into the space.So sick of dawsons diagonal ball! Not looking good for us, haven't really had a shot on goal worthy of the name.. Closest chance was an Eriksen free kick.
Also bentaleb instead of capoue on the bench?!?Haha not much love for the mighty Spurs between the two of us, eh. Capoue took a knock against Norwich, still recovering.
-
another colossal europa night for spurs.
wondering what team little 'Arry puts out tonight, and whether Soldado gets to start or not?Got Cardiff on the weekend, and they don't seem to be doing the best right now, so maybe Sherwood plays first team tonight and tries to scrape a result against Cardiff on sunday, or not...
Looking pretty toothless so far. Soldado is non-existent again and Ade has gone quiet. Naughton not quick enough getting back, Eriksen's working hard but not really delivering. Meh, will probably end 0-0.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
This.
In your opinion what is the point of having refs then?
I don't even..
Didn't we do this conversation last week?
Probably, but the issue still stands.
Or if need be, implement the 30s penalty straight away.
This is probably a good starting point when reffing a game. Come down hard, early. Set the tone early in the game.
I believe people should be dicks MORE.
The main problem with reffing is the idea that everything is an accident and that everyone is playing with the best intentions.
Whilst this is often true for throw-ins, it's rarely true in a competitive game. We should put more pressure on refs to make calls (of any kind) and not give them the safety net of "well, they probably didn't mean it" – which whilst perhaps being true, isn't conducive to the correct team always having the advantage (and perhaps winning the game).
Hacking, mallets-under-wheels, raised arms, steering arm checks (below the elbow), bike-on-bike contact, shoves, holding, etc... all rarely called and certainly not penalty box calls (as many of them should be).
While admittedly I've played a lot less competitive games than you, I don't think it's as much a case of the ref thinking contact was not intended as a case of simply not catching exactly what happened. There's so many illegal moves thrown in a competitive game, I can appreciate how it can be hard for a ref to not just see them but also call them correctly. The last thing we should be doing as a community is put MORE pressure on these already tense situations. If we have LESS tense situations the ref is more inclined to call them.
In my opinion, refereeing is probably the least explored aspect of our game. If we want the standard of refereeing to improve, the regulations to be upheld and the general good of the game, the worst thing we can do is make it harder to referee. That's basically what you guys are suggesting: Make it harder to ref. I think that's wrong. Refereeing simply won't develop and grow at the same speed that players will learn to abuse the rules and worsen the game.
Everyone needs to read the rules, but then we need to play by them as well.
Any suggestion that players should be more flagrant and intentional in their foul play strikes me as a very dangerous route to go down.
^ that
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Oh man http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/tottenham-transfers-mario-balotelli-subject-3187900#ixzz2uX2iUSjU
Even if this is true, why would he want to come and why the FUCK would we want him? He's nothing but trouble and perhaps 2-3 exquisite goals per season.