Search results for:

Doc Forbes

Bert Krak

Dan Santoro

+1

More 'open', yes.

I don't know whether that's a good thing.
I like to have something on the right side that 'bounces' my eyes back into the picture,
you know, otherwise you 'drift out' to easily.

Why?

Rotating because it's looks tilted,
flipping because it looks more 'stable' that way,
and it's more pleasant to 'enter' the picture (as most of us are used to reading from left to right).

I understand the hesistation to mess around with it since it's analogue though.

How about flipping that one horizontally,
and then rotating it a tad ccw?

reminds me of this one...

lol !

..also

From the awesome https://twitter.com/sixthformpoet

Frankel walks into a bar.
BARMAN: Why the long face?
FRANKEL: My job doesn't challenge me. Glass of champagne, please.

Some ancient Velvia 50 through my Mju II[URL="http://imdabestmayne.tumblr.com/post/30384898494/old-industries-die-hard"][/URL]

Nice!

Nice colours.
And that BMX shot I like a lot!

Har har !

awesome Lenticular cloud shots[[/URL]

+1

[URL="http://holykrampus.tumblr.com/image/20719829767"]](http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-16302606)

ha,
reminds me of that one -

Just need to find something to black out the gap with

You could try black Shoe Goo.

For silver grain junkies.

Guy has unfortunately stopped posting recently as he's busy with work.
There definately are quite some gems in that stream.

Still puzzling how he gets that 'look' though; he shoots 400 ASA Tri-X,
and I'm rather sure the majority of pictures he posts on that blog are scanned / tweaked negs -
not scanned prints of the negs. The grain looks so 'analogue'.
It looks 'thrashy' in a really good way.

The point is merely that the guy has apparently no experience whatsoever;
to learn the very basics like correct exposure, depth of field, etc. it is clever to use
a digital camera, because it really saves a lot of time, and a lot of money.