-
-
You can critised the action of the Israel government and not be anti-Semitic
I agree - just as I think you can criticise Hamas and not be islamophobic.
I don't know if the "whole premise" of the Israeli govt is to use anti-semitism as a reason for action. I guess to some extent the belief in the need for a militarily equipped Israeli state is due to centuries of anti-semitic persecution, so maybe?
-
-
-
I'm not conflating the two - my exact point is that you are criticising Israel and don't see that as anti-semitic, but are accusing those who criticise Hamas as islamophobic.
In either case there's a distinction between the race and the organisation doing bad things, in both cases they expressly cite religion as part of their motivation and charter, and in both cases you can look at history for causes as to why they've got their (Israel as a reaction to longstanding persecution of Jews, Hamas as a response to the plight of Arabs in Palestine).
You could say "if you don't think the actions of Israel are a result of a valid fear of persecution following centuries of anti-Semitism but instead as some sort of innate colonialism then I'm afraid you're dancing with anti-Semitism"
-
So to be clear - when you say that this is all Israel's fault and reject any attempt to apply even a little bit of nuance - that's not anti-semitic; but you think others are "assuming the worst of" the Palestinian people (which I don't think anyone has - they may have blamed Hamas though) and that's islamophobic?
On the same logic as you use, you're anti-Semitic. I doubt that's actually true, but then I don't think the other posters are islamophobic either
-
-
-
The fact he is well known (and therefore more people are mourning him) probably is what makes this specific news item noteworthy though, isn't it?
And the tweet is daft - it's not slander to say that someone is controversial. It seems to be true - saying "only controversial in some people's eyes" sort of proves the point, controversy implies different views
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yeah first para is not an unreasonable description. I think justified makes it sound cynical though - whereas the sense I get from Jewish friends is that it isn't cynical, they feel genuinely at threat - understandably so given the history.
Not that that excuses all the ways in which the Israeli state does unforgivable stuff, but I don't really feel I'm in much of a position to tell people whose families were killed a couple of generations ago just to get over it - and the issue is that the Oct 7 attacks just reinforce the fear that many Israelis feel they need to use force to protect themselves.
Sadly I think "provoke a reaction" was exactly what those planning the Oct 7 attacks probably wanted, and it's what they're getting