-
Perhaps his lack of connections :)
But don't forget that others (or was it the party itself?) got fined. A key factor in the overall outcome was that crap-ness of electoral law that made it difficult to take meaningful action. In other words, had the law been clearer/better, there could have been more prosecutions.
Watch C4 News tonight and I imagine you will get chapter and verse (as it was their investigation that started it all).
-
-
A bit more info
http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/latest_news/cps-statement-election-expenses/
It looks like he is standing for South Thanet again in these elections. I would guess this news is unlikely to boost his chances! That could gift the seat to a Kipper.
-
-
A good piece from Martin Wolf in the FT on the 'no deal' nonsense (paywall)
https://www.ft.com/content/83396e2a-45ef-11e7-8519-9f94ee97d996
-
-
-
Some entertaining poster wars
https://twitter.com/JamieRoss7/status/870171521544847360
Reminds me a bit of that graffiti thing (the battle between the graffiti artist and the council who try to paint over it)
-
-
-
Here's one:

From this New Statesman article (on 5th May), and evidently sourced from YouGov.
I think I might have also seen some analysis by LSE or people like that.
Edit: I have found the YouGov source.
-
-
-
-
I'm not sure about the TV debate thing... Won't they all just gang up on Corbyn as the primary challenger?
Standing up to someone who is in the same room would surely be a better ploy for making yourself look like a tough leader, rather than criticising someone who is sat on the sofa at home (after having finished her girl's jobs around the house).
-
A slightly unexpected contribution from the Wellcome Collection
https://twitter.com/ExploreWellcome/status/869821762841833472







A suitable time to revive this cartoon (for a moment's quiet reflection)