Eejit

Most recent activity

• FS - NJS Level build

  in Complete bikes and frame & forks • 16 hours, 15 minutes

  

  Oof that paintjob is 🔥

• Football

  in Miscellaneous and Meaningless • 16 hours, 59 minutes

  

  Minus 1?

• Neil Orrell step through

  in Complete bikes and frame & forks • 1 day, 23 hours

  

  V nice, would be all over this if I had anyone who might fit it

• step throughs/ top tube phobia/sweet shoppers/ low rider gravellers

  in Bikes & Bits • 1 day, 23 hours

  

  https://www.lfgss.com/conversations/3692­31/#comment16237426

  Much potential

• FS - Adidas FiveTen Trailcross LT shoes

  in Components, clothing and miscellany • 3 days, 12 hours

  

  I will take these, pm on its way

• Bike Storage: Wall mounts, stands, lock-ups, sheds, etc.

  in Bikes & Bits • 3 days, 15 hours

  

  Just what you’d expect for your 14 grand investment

• Insects and Spiders

  in Miscellaneous and Meaningless • 3 days, 17 hours

  

  God I saw that the other day. Lovecraftian nightmare.

• Films

  in Miscellaneous and Meaningless • 3 days, 22 hours

  

  Logan is on Disney+. Got a bit unnecessarily sentimental in the finale, but definitely - and I realise this is a very low bar to hurdle - the best of the x-men films.

• That Starmer fella...

  in Miscellaneous and Meaningless • 3 days, 22 hours

  

  Fairly obviously not, no. There are various areas of power within the party: whether the shadow cabinet; the PLP; the NEC; so on and so forth. The leader is not a dictator.

  Do the canary control any of these various areas of power? Again, fairly obviously not.

  Apologies for posting about Starmer in the…[checks topic]…Starmer thread.

• That Starmer fella...

  in Miscellaneous and Meaningless • 3 days, 23 hours

  

  Lol this is so weak.

  Criticising Starmer for trying to out-authoritarian the Tories isn’t “factional nonsense”. I want Labour to be providing opposition on this, not nodding along and saying “yes, but can we made it more crackdown-y?”. It says bad things about what Starmer’s tendencies would be should he get into power.

  Conversely, yes, the PLP moving to permanently exclude Corbyn is factional nonsense. That was kind of my point: it’s the PLP engaging in factional nonsense at a time when you think they would have better things to do, like provide some opposition to this government and their shocking handling of just about everything.

  I don’t even know who or what Lowkey is, and I’ve never read the canary so idgaf about those people. Last time I checked they didn’t have control of the party, and as far as I’m concerned they are irrelevant.