Most recent activity
-
The Guardian did a story on the health issues among people near the WTC site. I posted in the comments underneath it "I visited Ground Zero in December 2011 and it stank of kerosene round there!" I meant 2001, obviously. I didn't even notice the mistake until I read the replies the next day and they went crazy, people were calling me a shill, a lying sack of shit and one of the conspirators.
-
Taking a knee?
-
Cyclist writes to local company to complain about their driver:
-
Oh, that was 3 years ago, soz.
-
Look out, he set a petition up yesterday:
We, the undersigned, call on British parliment and its members to make it compulsary for bycycles used on public highways (roads) . To have insurance to cover damages and injury to 3rd parties and the property thereof. In addition, to make it compulsary to have an identification plate clearly visible and displayed on bycycles in order that they and the rider can be traced and prosecuted where appropriate.
-
That haircut's very right wing, they love their partings .
-
The only paper to report that it was a Cemex truck was the Camden New Journal:
Since a small newspaper like CNJ had the resources to verify that it was Cemex "whose vehicle was involved in the collision", why did the Evening Standard feel obligated to censor the photo it posted on its website?
saferoxfordstreet.blogspot.co.uk/2016/09/nameandshame-part-2-whos-scrubbing.html?m=1
-
I'm trying to think of an analogy but, say a campaign was launched to stop the bullying of fat people, say. Would Epstein pop up and declare "It works both ways , sometimes fat people are annoying"?
-
That was shit. It was Angela "my husband is a cyclist"Epstein. The only bright spot was the subtitles that said "Cyclists campaign for psychopaths".
That butcher's chopping up lumps of bloody meat. What does it mean?