I’m not sure that I agree or maybe I’m being dumb. Or possibly a bit of both.
If cyclists voting green meant that Khan didn’t get the 50%, it would be a strategic failure, right?
Your point assumes Bailey gets over 50% but that’s a big assumption to have up front as a reason to preemptively split the vote.
Sounds like - ‘we’re going to loose anyway, may as well vote green’.
But why lose in the first place? Does that make any sense?