Most recent activity
-
If you like Neopan and Tmax … those are both (relatively) high contrast, with above-average red sensitivity. So other films that fit that bill are;
Fomapan 400
Rollei Retro 400In my opinion both of these look good at EI 400. Foma can look good at EI 800 - which might (with extra dev temp/time) get you a contrast curve close to the examples you show. You might not feel you need a yellow/orange filter with these (because of their spectral sensitivity). With Kentmere or HP5 (and Tri-X/Double-X) you probably will. Both can be bought in 30.5m rolls and pretty cheap.
I would shortlist your developers based on practicalities first: how would it store and does that fit your usage. I’ve only really used off brand versions of Rodinal and Xtol in the last couple of years. I might try Pyro 510 but … I also might just keep things simple.
I’d echo @M_V ‘s point about overthinking this. Most scenes, on most films, can be quickly tweaked to look about the same. B&W film is like shoes. Most work. Not all are as comfy ☺️
{ love the 21stCenturyNorth bowlers shot }
-
-
-
-
-
I’ve been nerding out on b&w film over the last two years mostly processing in Xtol and Rodinal and these are my brief thoughts on some of the films out there.
Kentmere 100/400, FP4/HP5 - baseline films. Push and pull just fine. You just get larger apparent grain with the Kentmere film and not quite the insane latitude. TriX behaves exactly as HP5 as far as I can tell.
Ilford Pan 100 - A smidge more contrast than the above. Therefore a little less suitable to push (I still shoot it at EI 200 all the time but wouldn’t go further). Poor man’s FP4.
Pan F 50 - A bit slower than box. A bit more contrast again and just kinda beautiful. Process straight after shooting essential.
Adox HR-50 - High detail. Low lattitude. High contrast. A bit of red sensitivity built-in but looks good with a yellow filter too (requires a bit more care shooting and processing than the films above). Thin negs are best. Clear base. Benefits from a prewash. Easy to scan. Cheap.
Rollei Retro 400 - very similar characteristics to HR-50 (and nothing like other ‘400’ speed films such as HP5 or TriX). Some grain. Moody shot at 400. Benefits from a prewash. Very cheap.
Tmax 100 - very, very fine grain. High detail. Pretty high contrast. Red sensitive (which I really don’t like for portraits but is good for landscapes). Needs lots of fixing and washing. For some reason is like it in 120 but in 35mm I’m not sure maybe I need to hone my times for Xtol for this to get the tonality I see others get. It’s also really expensive in 35mm.
Tmax 3200 and Ilford Delta 3200. I’ve not shot enough to say anything other than … I liked both best @EI 1000 and it didn’t look any better than HP5. Mad grain.
Foma 400 … I have 61 metres of this in my fridge but haven’t shot any yet.
Sorry for the long effortpost.
-
-
-
-
#keepcyclingweird