Most recent activity
-
Oops, that obviously hasn't sunk in.
I'll try harder.
Thanks.
-
I'm fully aware that I could have written those sentences more coherently.
Sorry.
-
This has become a semantics conversation, so probably of limited value.
But, FWIW, I wrote "justify" to mean "support the reasons that you have found with a basis that is arguable and defensible in the context of known evidence, in accordance with the classical liberal approach of allowing others to have their liberty, unless that liberty deprives others of an equivalent or greater liberty."
CF wanting others to wear masks indoors: I justify asking others to forego the liberty of choice over mask wearing, since them not wearing a mask has a demonstrably high chance of depriving yet more people of their liberty of being healthy and alive.
Outdoors, very much not so much.
-
Is it?
I think so. Did you read the study?
-
I was just sharing a study that supports the contention that outdoor transmission is very rare compared with indoors.
Yeah, wear a mask outdoors / helmet on a bike if you want to, but it's hard to justify wanting others to do likewise.
-
What's the point in having limited numbers and masks in shops, if when outside in the town centre its packed like sardines and no one wearing a mask.
Because outdoor transmissions is really very rare compared to indoor?
-
Yep, driving on the right.
-
Cable ties are so often the answer.
I was pondering this fact just yesterday.
Is it the case that
A) most forums (fora?) Like LFGSS eventually spread out to cover almost all topics?
or B) Bike forums do so?
or C) Geographically based forums where people get to know each other IRL do so?
or D) microcosm levels of usability promote them to do so?
or E) a lack of "keep to topic" moderation allows them to do so?
or a mixture of the above?
I don't see XDA Developers forums having threads about watches / gardening / plumbing / art / jokes etc etc