1996 Trek Y22 OCLV

Posted on
Page
of 7
  • Okay. Really crazy idea I’m throwing out there. Since any serious hills are to be tackled on my Kona, could I make this a hard-nose without landing it in Anti?

  • Well, rigid would be much lighter than the current fork, and probably about as effective as that old thing :-)

    Maybe something like an Exotic?

  • That’s what I’m looking at. I want something 3K Carbon, but it needs Canti/V-brake mounts

  • A full sus frame with no front bounce is stupid, but then so is URT, so wahey!

  • pffft... you'll be saying this was a bad idea next.

  • Here's the answer. Fit a 29er front wheel!

  • My vote is not to ruin it. It's survived this long all original. It's cool as it stands and saving a bit of weight whilst turning it into something anti seems like a waste to me.

  • Shit... I mean Retro MTB thread >>>>

  • I kind of want to have some fun with it. I think I’m going to change out nearly all of the components, but since everything on it is original, I’ll be keeping all of it, should I choose to rebuild into a retro MTB, or sell it with it’s original bits.

    I probably won’t be using it for its intended use case - unfortunately. I think that lighter, stiffer forks will make the bike much more usable, for what I want to do with it, but obviously if it does veer into anti, I’ll always have the original parts.

  • @BareNecessities Thanks for pointing me in the direction of the Exotic forks. I’ve looked into them and found exactly what I want: 26” fork, rigid, carbon, fat tyre clearance, and v-brake mounts. That was easier than I expected.

    https://www.carboncycles.cc/index.php?p=1058&

  • Cool. Now you just need a nice rigid frame to go with it ;-)

  • Ahaha - well, on this one I need the rear suspension looking at. I believe it’s leaking air, very slowly.

    I’m looking at ~55% sag on the rear shock, though I inflated the rear shock to 270psi on Friday, so I’ll have to have that properly serviced.

  • Fair enough, a bike you use and like always beats one you don't.

  • My thinking exactly. Also, how I’m picturing this, it will actually look pretty sick

  • Okay so I think that my general direction for this project is just going to be to carbon-ify this bike. Carbon bars, stem, seatpost, brakes, etc. I think it would go much nicer than the silver bits that are currently on there.

  • If you're going rigid front then go rigid rear, get a link made to replace the shock. Then 800mm bars and fat slicks and make it into a bizarre-o fixy skidder?

  • Then throw it in the bin and get a bike that hasn't been immolated.

  • Sounds like a plan

  • Then throw it in the bin and get a bike that hasn't been immolated.

    Nah, I want to see this. It's got to be at least 10x better than anything Amey's ever built.

  • Just gotta keep da squish! None of this rigid nonsense.

  • Going rigid rear doesn’t sound like a bad idea, but to be fair I think it would feel scary as fuck to ride without rear sus.

    Will either have the rear-sus serviced, or replace it with a more modern one for the sake of decent performance, and not snapping the tiny bit of seat tube this bike is endowed with.

  • What is the current fork? Maybe some older Rockshox SID air forks would save some weight, and give you more usable suspension.

    I think they came out around 98, so not too far out.

  • Only a madman would ride off-road with no sus, @Howard

  • The current forks are Rockshox Judy XC. They are some pretty light forks, since they have suspension, and we’re made 22 years ago: 1600g, if my research is correct.

  • New set of RS-1s and a Super Deluxe would be incredible if you felt like splashing out?

    Or this if you're feeling more sensible...
    https://www.pinkbike.com/buysell/2231981/

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

1996 Trek Y22 OCLV

Posted by Avatar for ShutUpBlud @ShutUpBlud

Actions