-
• #202
That photo looks familiar...;)
indeed!

top left: Pisti's best mate?
-
• #204
free tesco eye test on friday.
-
• #205
Glasses are confusing, I have 4 pairs. One says "Jeff Banks" on the side but it's not my name! another pair claim to be "Police" but I'm not a copper.
Also have some Kangol ones with transitions lenses.
I bet Jeff Banks doesn't really sit there drawing pairs of glasses and selling the designs to opticians, he's too busy presenting "the clothes show" for starters. -
• #206
..............blah,blah............... he's too busy presenting "the clothes show" for starters.
RPM is old school it's official
this page was last updated.........
i was listening to the radio five live this morning and the female co presenter had never heard of the band ub40.
-
• #207
I wish I didn't.
-
• #208
Seeing as cycling is slightly sporty and my brother-in-law is an optician, you might be interested in this.
He specialises in improving the vision, even by tiny amounts of athletes to improve their performance. In this case, the Northants cricket team
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid29318049001?bckey=AQ~~,AAAAAAnV5Z0~,xyoxShbYDLH15l1vwIIVsop0qj9qrqRT&bctid=748671207001Only trouble is he's in Essex, and he's not cheap.
I got my glasses off the internet instead for £16 and £30. -
• #209
He specialises in improving the vision, even by tiny amounts of athletes to improve their performance.
I specialise in folding collars of polo shirts down. Service swap?
-
• #210
:-)
-
• #212
Having heavy rims was rather the point- 90%+ of the time I wear lenses, for the times I do not I rather wanted some glasses that said "I'm a pair of glasses"
-
• #213
What sort of dosh are you talking for Lindbergs? they look awesome*
*expensive
-
• #214
£255
-
• #215
Hmm, bit more than I can afford right now
-
• #216
Me too.
-
• #217
They're nice, though(t).
-
• #218
By the way, my wife spent more on a pair of reading glasses. And lost them.
-
• #219
My current glasses cost £215 approximately 12 years ago, so worked out on a cost per year basis they've not been a terrible burden.
However the proscription is now rather out of date, and one side is held together with wire where an ex-girlfriend sat on them.
-
• #220
I dig what you're after but you should be as comfy as possible in them first and foremost.
Re the Lindbergs, there are loads of companies that do variants of rimless glasses far cheaper.
Again spec savers 2-4-1 deal:

-
• #221
I always manage to brake rimless ones.
-
• #222
^^ they're broken, too :-(
-
• #223
I'm liking the ones old Jeff Banks slaved over a drawing board for. They are very light and comfortable. First pair of metal frames I've tried in over ten years. I want the Lindbergs now though.
Who else finds a combo of different glasses and contact lenses for different days/situations works for them?
-
• #224
I always manage to brake rimless ones.
I'm sure they shouldn't be rimless, that's the problem. Brakeless FTW.
-
• #225
^^That would be my ideal, drawer full of them. But different glasses really throw me off, despite same strength lenses. When I get new specs it takes a few days to adjust to the way they sit on my face (euph), view of rims through the eyes, weight, comfort etc. I feel like I'm swimming for a while, or walking pissed, until they're comfortable. Not sure I could be naffed with that each time I swapped, desirable as it is.
Multi_Grooves
coppiThat
rpm
EEI
bq
Dammit
nuknow
TheorySwine
Black with Rhinestones Vintage Cat Eye Glasses with Wood Grain Texture
Want.