-
• #103102
: )
-
• #103103
-
• #103104
Awesome
-
• #103105
-
• #103106
why is this one porn? its a nice bicycle but here? (genuine question)
-
• #103107
-
• #103108
I guess it's a pretty standard looking modern bike, quite alot like that around.
Also it's unusual to see a utilitarian machine in here. Bikes designed or adapted to carry lots of stuff usually end up in the functional thread.
-
• #103109
Where they belong!
-
• #103110
99!! now thats a great funny show! loved it!
-
• #103111
.
-
• #103112
My
Might as well fail at the first hurdle
-
• #103113
A case of incorrect measurements by the seller, pretty annoying really
-
• #103114
That's not where you failed. We don't post our own bikes in the porn thread.
-
• #103115
Mea culpa
-
• #103116
-
• #103117
Reckon it needs a black stem, slammed, and a 130BCD crank for full porn, also not sure what's up with that head tube treatment. The big disagreement between HT and ST angles isn't really working for me either, but these are all pretty minor niggles aside from the stem.
Pretty porny.
-
• #103118
toooop!
-
• #103119
-
• #103120
-
• #103121
-
• #103122
Frame looks great, but the stand is outstanding.
-
• #103123
Wha...? I thought that Hope thing was a track bike? And is that caliper just not plumbed, or is that some mad new hidden hydraulics...?
-
• #103124
It's the TT version, printed Ti parts replaced with milled Al to keep the price competitive.
-
• #103125
The brake mounted radially is interesting.
Kinda backs up my feeling that there's nothing wrong with the concept of the single bolt post - it just needs to be a nice part to offer infinite adjustment.