It's right there 'only the perception of it.' You need to work on your grammar.
But you are confusing two things, the internet not being private isn't related only to encryption.
What is your point about encryption? That no method of encryption is uncrackable (probably true)? That the NSA and other agencies were envolved in the design of many of the common encryption algorithms, and as such it's a reasonable expectation that they are aware of, or design weaknesses into it (also likely). That doesn't mean that encryption doesn't exist (do you want me to encrypt a file for you, to prove that what comes out is not what comes in), or that no form of encryption is fairly secure, given a realistic amount of resources.
Unfortunately all your responses are those of a classic troll (attacking people, trying to distract the debate through pedantry, for example), and I don't believe you are actually trying to make a serious point here, and as such any attempt at serious response from me is futile
@H-Bomb
But you are confusing two things, the internet not being private isn't related only to encryption.
What is your point about encryption? That no method of encryption is uncrackable (probably true)? That the NSA and other agencies were envolved in the design of many of the common encryption algorithms, and as such it's a reasonable expectation that they are aware of, or design weaknesses into it (also likely). That doesn't mean that encryption doesn't exist (do you want me to encrypt a file for you, to prove that what comes out is not what comes in), or that no form of encryption is fairly secure, given a realistic amount of resources.
Unfortunately all your responses are those of a classic troll (attacking people, trying to distract the debate through pedantry, for example), and I don't believe you are actually trying to make a serious point here, and as such any attempt at serious response from me is futile