You really haven't a clue, have you? Do your self a favour and read up on the subject, yeah?
I studied Aeronautical Engineering at university and I've worked in aviation for 13 years since, I'd hope I do have something of a clue. Would you care to explain how the Buran wasn't a knee-jerk reaction to the US space shuttle program, how it wasn't a tracing-paper, me-too copy of the US shuttle? See also Tu-144/Concorde; An-124/C-5 Galaxy; Tu-4/B-29; Yak-38/Harrier; Sukhoi T-4/XB-70; Su-27/F-15; MiG-29/F-16/F/A-18; Su-24/F-111; Tu-160/B-1; Sukhoi PAK FA/F-22.
Incidentally, 'agrigultural' isn't necessarily a criticism. Soyuz isn't the most advanced technology in the world, but it's sturdy and reliable, as you point out.
I studied Aeronautical Engineering at university and I've worked in aviation for 13 years since, I'd hope I do have something of a clue. Would you care to explain how the Buran wasn't a knee-jerk reaction to the US space shuttle program, how it wasn't a tracing-paper, me-too copy of the US shuttle? See also Tu-144/Concorde; An-124/C-5 Galaxy; Tu-4/B-29; Yak-38/Harrier; Sukhoi T-4/XB-70; Su-27/F-15; MiG-29/F-16/F/A-18; Su-24/F-111; Tu-160/B-1; Sukhoi PAK FA/F-22.
Incidentally, 'agrigultural' isn't necessarily a criticism. Soyuz isn't the most advanced technology in the world, but it's sturdy and reliable, as you point out.