Bike porn

When did the term 'steel' stop covering stainless varieties too?

Having looked at the question, I think I may have a candidate to replace stainless steel if anybody want to spend huge sums on a tiny improvement. Since the constraints are to use the least possible cross section (for aerodynamic reasons) to provide the required stiffness, we're looking for a tough material with a high Young modulus. I think TZM might be it; 60% stiffer than steel, so one could replace the 2.3x0.9 section of a CX-Ray with 1.8x0.7. Because it's a bit denser than steel, weight only comes down by 20%, but spoke drag should be cut by 20%, which is a worthwhile saving. Strength is probably sufficient, being a bit higher than spoke grade stainless steel, to get a way with the smaller cross section, although given the anchorages it is probably desirable to retain the 2.0mm round ends.

Well in engineering terms stainless steel is a completely different material group to carbon steel, but I was just trying to mess a bit with you.

Looking at the TZM Molybdenum I think its biggest problem is its tensile strength being fairly low at 760 MPa compared to most normal aerospokes being hardneded to about 1500-1600 MPa (CX-ray fx) and we know that even they are far from "bullet proof". That meens more spokes to make a working wheel for the TZM and eliminating the aero saving.