When did the term 'steel' stop covering stainless varieties too?
Having looked at the question, I think I may have a candidate to replace stainless steel if anybody want to spend huge sums on a tiny improvement. Since the constraints are to use the least possible cross section (for aerodynamic reasons) to provide the required stiffness, we're looking for a tough material with a high Young modulus. I think TZM might be it; 60% stiffer than steel, so one could replace the 2.3x0.9 section of a CX-Ray with 1.8x0.7. Because it's a bit denser than steel, weight only comes down by 20%, but spoke drag should be cut by 20%, which is a worthwhile saving. Strength is probably sufficient, being a bit higher than spoke grade stainless steel, to get a way with the smaller cross section, although given the anchorages it is probably desirable to retain the 2.0mm round ends.
When did the term 'steel' stop covering stainless varieties too?
Having looked at the question, I think I may have a candidate to replace stainless steel if anybody want to spend huge sums on a tiny improvement. Since the constraints are to use the least possible cross section (for aerodynamic reasons) to provide the required stiffness, we're looking for a tough material with a high Young modulus. I think TZM might be it; 60% stiffer than steel, so one could replace the 2.3x0.9 section of a CX-Ray with 1.8x0.7. Because it's a bit denser than steel, weight only comes down by 20%, but spoke drag should be cut by 20%, which is a worthwhile saving. Strength is probably sufficient, being a bit higher than spoke grade stainless steel, to get a way with the smaller cross section, although given the anchorages it is probably desirable to retain the 2.0mm round ends.