I think that if you're a higher rate tax payer, and you buy a bike for a grand, then you still stand to save between £250 and £400...
But yeah, for those earning a regular salary and buying a bike over £500 it seems like you could get fucked over.
It's also unclear what happens if you used the £1,000 allowance to buy a bike significantly over that sum, presumably you'd only pay 25% on the first £1,000 of the bike (that which your company owns)... otherwise you'd be in for a really nasty surprise when your finance director tells you he wants 25% of a £2k bike that you part-bought on the scheme.
I didn't think you could buy anything over a grand on the scheme. As I understood it, the scheme was only for bikes under £1000. That was why all the standard-build Chris Boardman bikes were priced at just under a grand, to catch the top end of the cycle to work people.
You were never meant to be able to buy a bike over a grand.
You shouldn't have been able to add your own cash to the £1k voucher limit as you hire the bike from your employer and you can't hire something that you own part of.
The reason the limit was set at a grand was that that should be more than enough to buy a very decent commuter bike and the limit was placed to stop people buying bikes for competition.
It's just another part of the scheme that was never implemented properly.
You were never meant to be able to buy a bike over a grand.
You shouldn't have been able to add your own cash to the £1k voucher limit as you hire the bike from your employer and you can't hire something that you own part of.
The reason the limit was set at a grand was that that should be more than enough to buy a very decent commuter bike and the limit was placed to stop people buying bikes for competition.
It's just another part of the scheme that was never implemented properly.