I feel that any peer voting system will massively favour London, those people who win the three captain sots are more likely to pick their team mates, and are very unlikely to pick people from outside of London, who they seldom get to play with and see how good they are
interesting idea, but my fear would be the draft becoming a bit of a london-fest and not really represent the uk scene properly
I'm not convinced. We are talking about trying to get the 9 best UK players (outside of the top 3 teams) together to form superteams for the last three spots. We all know about all the good players in the UK.
Any player interested in going puts their name on the list. We only vote for team captains - three spots. The rest is a draft.
People would be voting for the 3 players. There will be more voters from London, but that does not mean they will only vote for London players. We will all have just played each other in the UK champs. We know who all the good players are, not just those in London.
I'm not convinced. We are talking about trying to get the 9 best UK players (outside of the top 3 teams) together to form superteams for the last three spots. We all know about all the good players in the UK.
Any player interested in going puts their name on the list. We only vote for team captains - three spots. The rest is a draft.
People would be voting for the 3 players. There will be more voters from London, but that does not mean they will only vote for London players. We will all have just played each other in the UK champs. We know who all the good players are, not just those in London.