You are reading a single comment by @JonoMarshall and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
@JonoMarshall
After chatting with Nick over some schnitzel I think that we either have to simplify the rule book and develop the sport with no regard for the polo of yore. Basically anything's a goal if the ball ends up in the net... bike, shuffle, shot, whatever. In which case Marc's brilliant wheel shot would be a goal. Perhaps bike polo starts to incorporate more hockey style dribble/shots (think Aidan from BAD) and some elements of radball. But in my opinion the fundamentals would stay the same, how many people would choose to shuffle a shot at goal anyway? It's easier at speed, but less effective and easier to predict I reckon.
Alternatively we need to stick to polo-specific rules and develop/patch the rule book we have with the roots of it still within the traditional game of polo. In which case, Marc's wheel play shouldn't be a goal simply because it encourages "dangerous" play and is not a "shot" as it has been defined in the past.
I'm not sure which direction I'd prefer polo to head in, but I think it's important to consider the wider implications of such changes/additions to the rules.
I also believe that wishy-washy decisions on what to add without thinking about the wider implications is what leads to complicated rules. (Leading to the need for expert/skilled refs and a difficult/confusing game for newcomers to get into.)