• 100% agree with both bill and Lal.

    on the euro's are seperate from league thing, I don't see why. The league is surely a fairer messure of skill that a tourey? And having an extra qualifying league before the euros is frankley unfeasable (particularly with the number of teams there will be by then. Assuming that the euro's is a limited number of teams from london, and there are a number of teams contesting those place, and the team that won the league is one of them they should go through as having already proved themselves.

    Also the precedence has been set with the first euro's and bad... really they went though because of their position in the league, wouldn't it be unfiar to the next winners of the euros to not get the same opportunity?

    Anyway lets put it to the vote, unless anyone has a stronger reason for the 1st place not to go through than the two things are unrelated.

    Oh and although I think both cambridge and oxford could almost certainly manage a team (if the two people who wanted to play really thought they could get three players together couldn't you get three players from those six to come down one week and another three the next?) I think in seriousness manchester managing to come down basically every weekend (remebemer theres talk of releasing a fixture each week) is unlikely... but if there's a fee to enter and they pay and can't make it, guess that's not really our problem...

About

Avatar for Khornight2 @Khornight2 started