i didn't listen to it but as it's a short program that probably takes snippets of information to tell a story to it's listeners (you can make your own judgments as to that demographic) so i wouldn't expect an unbiased broad insight into whatever the subject was.
one thing i always tell myself when watching/listening/reading to journalism is to remind myself that whenever i have seen a subject you are very knowledgeable about in the media it's always unrepresentative misinformed and usually just plain wrong.
i apply that rationale to most of the mainstream media.
badly researched lazy journalism is the norm.
i didn't listen to it but as it's a short program that probably takes snippets of information to tell a story to it's listeners (you can make your own judgments as to that demographic) so i wouldn't expect an unbiased broad insight into whatever the subject was.
one thing i always tell myself when watching/listening/reading to journalism is to remind myself that whenever i have seen a subject you are very knowledgeable about in the media it's always unrepresentative misinformed and usually just plain wrong.
i apply that rationale to most of the mainstream media.
badly researched lazy journalism is the norm.