-
Read it all. It is literally a litany of evidenced wrongdoings by one side and a 'caveat' of 'both sidesism' with precious little or no evidence against the other.
But there, in black and white, is independent evidence one faction tried to lose the election on purpose. The faction that had not, as it happened, been overwhelmingly democratically elected.
FTR, the Forde report was commissioned to investigate the leaked report. It wasn't intended to investigate how bad the Labour party was, but you lift a stone, you find all sorts of shit.
I'm not sure how you can reasonably 'both sides' this. One faction was fighting to win a general election, the other was doing everything it could to lose said GE. Saying 'they're both as bad as eachother' is knowingly disingenuous at best and outright truth twisting to put it mildly.
hugo7
I'm doing anything but sneer at people who don't agree with me. All I'm doing is pointing to an independent report that states unequivocally one side of the Labour party colluded with the media to undermine its own chances at two previous general elections and funnelled campaign money away from winnable seats (which could have changed the result) and towards safe seats held by MPs from their own faction.
Why that isn't a fucking national scandal is beyond me. I don't give two hoots whether people aren't feeling it. It's a fucking disgrace. Essentially the people in charge of the Labour Party currently figured diamond-hard Brexit and Boris Johnson was a price worth paying for them taking back control of the party. Fuck those cunts.
E2a: I mean, do you reckon the last five years have been worth it? Just to get a Brylcreemed nonentity and his coterie of mooing Blairite 90s tribute wankers back in charge of the opposition?