You are reading a single comment by @Greenbank and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • How naive? When I saw the sample output was 2 trillion I didn't even bother trying mine (a list of chars). It would've required 10 TB of memory

  • The hint was in "semi-naive".

    I initially solved part 2 with a meet-in-the-middle solution.

    My part1 could do up to 10 steps easily, and trying it with 20 steps showed it would complete in under a second.

    So I computed the final letter frequencies of each of the 100 possible input pairs (my final input/rules had 10 unique elements) when taken to step 20 (since each of those would take under a second), and then the step 20 output of my proper input and then worked out the step 40 frequencies from the combination of those.

    My guess for part 2 was going to be something like "What is the difference in frequencies between the 1,000,000,000th and 1,000,000,001st elements in the output after 40 steps?" which would have required a lot different jiggery to get to than my eventual solution for the day.

About

Avatar for Greenbank @Greenbank started