-
No. That paragraph is the impact assessment. And unlike the other parts where they spell out the impact and cost to individuals and conclude the service would shutter. With section 240 this shows the impact of their preferred option... But actually they don't spell out the impact they just change their argument to be that whatever the cost it's worth it, and that they know of no example of an individual who may be impacted... Effectively hand waving the impact away. But the impact remains.
Oh... they thought of me in the impact assessment document that tries to quantify the impact if the law were brought in as-is:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/985283/Draft_Online_Safety_Bill_-_Impact_Assessment_Web_Accessible.pdf
I am and we do.
Meaning I am under the same burden as Facebook and Twitter.
Erm, hello?
That bit wasn't relevant to anything but it did distract you from the bit before.
HELLO 👋
But you just said I have the same costs as businesses covered, and I am impacted 🤷♀️