• The weird bit about the Sustrans thing is:

    For example, a recent academic study showed cycle helmets offer "effective protection at low speeds of less than 50km/h (31 mph)".

    My definition of low speed on a bike would be about half that. Anything above 20mph is pretty fast.

  • The next bit says

    ... less protective the faster cars are travelling, and were of "minimal" use in crashes with cars travelling at more than 50km/h (31 mph).

    So now I'm not sure whether the first 50km/h meant the speed of the bike, or the speed of the previously-unmentioned car it's colliding with.

  • now I'm not sure

    It's always best to read the actual study rather than somebody else's abstract of it. I don't suppose Sustrans are as bad as the Daily Mail, but everybody misses important detail and nuance when they try to convert academic results into actionable bullet points.

About

Avatar for useless @useless started