• Lol, can we use that reasoning to ban cars at rush hour too?

  • I think it's going to be 1 step forwards and 2 steps back for overall safety. The part of the routes they are trying to stop looks like it would be where they turn off the cycle superhighway 3 to show tourists st pauls but the alternative to dismounting in a more quiet narrow street for a long walk would be that they just use more main roads instead.

    The bit mentioning "protective equipment" I think city of london should have responded it's not a legal requirement and told them to do one. If they put in some silly rule that customers must wear a bunch of stuff to appease office workers who sit out in a park eating lunch as they cycle past it's just going to damage business, give it a few months and then another operator will have setup that's just not engaged at all with the council.

About