You are reading a single comment by @Tenners and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Agreed.... You're absolutely right; I've mixed my 'semi' up with my 'sub' @glws suggesting this has smaller rings than a standard compact (50-34) - I meant semi of course but indeed would have been better served putting full details in title.
Given my mistake and price has dropped to level I was reticent to go to I'll have a go elsewhere and, though interest in rings, not as whole chainset as per listing perhaps bring back with a more accurate/savvy listing title. Cheers
Pasty_Spumante
@Tenners
You might get more interest if you put the ratio in the title.
I would call this a semi-compact chainset, with 50/39 being standard, and 50/34 being compact. Anything smaller than 50/34 is what I would consider 'sub-compact'.
I came into the thread hoping for a 48/32 or something similar, so maybe people looking for the higher ratios aren't clicking through ..?