| | #1 |
| | Gear ratios for no brakes riding... Is it easier to lock up the rear wheel with a smaller front drive chainring (42t or less) paired with a larger rear cog (18t+)? Currently I'm riding 48t with 16t at the rear, I'm unsure how it would compare if I changed my setup... As always thanks for your help in advance! [edit]16th June 2009, I've noticed that the Guardian have linked here... how weird. It's not the best starting point, you should probably hit the home page and see what takes your interest http://www.londonfgss.com/ [/edit] |
| quote reply |
| | #2 |
| | Yes it is. Your ratio is over 80 inches and 70 or less would be much easier on your knees. Some Fixdgearlondon riders slide around on low or sub 60s Last edited by adoubletap; 25th May 2008 at 08:54. |
| quote reply |
| | #3 | |
| | Quote:
A smaller front will make things easier by itself (that is without getting a larger cog) A larger rear cog will also make things easier by itself. My point is that you do not have to change both to make skid stopping easier. So instead of changing both your cog and your chainring by a couple of teeth or so - you can make a bigger change to just either the cog or the chainring and get the same result (get the same gear inches). It would be cheaper to just drop your chainring down 4 or 6 teeth to achieve an easier skid as your chain length would shrink (so you don't have to buy a longer chain) and you don't have to buy a new larger cog. Use this gear calculator to work out gear inches: http://software.bareknucklebrigade.c...it.applet.html | |
| quote reply |
| | #13 | |
| | Quote:
I find 44-16 works well for everything. Good from a standing start, you can spin out on the flats but it's not so big you can't slow down with leg braking (although I also run a front brake for emergencies), and I can skid stop when I want to. The 'when I want to' bit is important - when you run a lower ratio it's important to be under control when you brake. I've tried lower ratios where the moment I've started leg braking, I've lost traction in the rear end - which can be very disconcerting. | |
| quote reply |
| | #14 |
| | If you have to ask the question you shouldn't be riding brakeless. Mine: 46x16 brakeless nice weather bike 44x16 pub/fun/rain brakeless bike 48x16 distance bike w/front brake(that doubles as the H/H bike sans brake) Last edited by |³|MA3K; 25th May 2008 at 11:28. Reason: ................................................................ |
| quote reply |
| | #15 |
| | Thanks for all the advice everyone! Much appreciated. To answer the questions, I am riding a Vivalo, with 48 x 16 currently brakeless. But unlike you guys I'm not living in the hustle and bustle of London. It's pretty calm on the way to and from work in sunny Southsea. Thanks for the advice and info! |
| quote reply |
| Bookmarks | Shortcuts | |
| Posts | Categories | |
| Tags |
| brakeless is shit, brakeless is stupid, brakeless riders dumb, brakes, gear, menace ii society, ratios, riding... |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What Gear Ratios Do You Ride? | repeatclicks | General | 448 | 57 Minutes Ago 13:19 |
| Ratios and chain tensioners | (dan) | Mechanics & Fixin' | 6 | 29th April 2008 17:38 |
| Putting Brakes on a Fuji Track. Any Suggestions for Better Bike with Brakes? | pete | Bikes & Bits | 15 | 23rd March 2008 17:48 |
| Riding a fixed-gear is like handicapping yourself... a wheeled freak show for wannabes. | |³|MA3K | Miscellaneous & Meaningless | 40 | 29th July 2007 07:23 |
| Press cuttings of Fixed-gear riding | Velocio | General | 5 | 10th May 2007 07:55 |