| | #52 |
| | No because it would be related to you current 5 minute maximal power, which would be less than your maximum VO2. Also from inrng http://inrng.com/2012/09/junior-worl...ion-prospects/ |
| quote reply |
| | #53 |
| | Close though. You could always time efforts from the top of the rise on the eastern side until you get to the mosque lights, to make it more like a 4min effort. Either way, if you want to eke out a bit more VO2Max (it's not very trainable anyway), people generally go for intervals between 3min and 5min in length, intensity adjusted accordingly, roughly 4 intervals with similar length recovery. Some people mix it up, some thrive on pushing it up with the shorter/more intense 3min stuff, some prefer to pull it up with the slightly more drawn out/less aaaargh 5min stuff. You won't really know which camp you belong to until you've a) seen progress and/or b) lost motivation to do the fucking things. |
| quote reply |
| | #54 |
| | I know (or have written down) the stats for mine, but I couldn't really care less. If I started banging out 4min HCs in 3m30, I knew my VO2Max had probably been nudged a little, amongst other things like lactate tolerance, neuromuscular endurance, pacing strategy, mental attitude, blah blah blah. |
| quote reply |
| | #55 | |
| | Quote:
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Compact-SR...item417053b35e | |
| quote reply |
| | #56 | ||
| | Quote:
Quote:
I need to stop overthinking things as usual. Neil, thanks for the link - still the cost of a bike! Or more than a pair of good race wheels for my track bike! The trouble with powermeter stuff is that I know I'll just end up wanting them on all my bikes - which would be crazy investment of money for some data. | ||
| quote reply |
| | #60 |
| | As I've said to neil, since getting it. The SRM is the best thing I've ever bought. Personally it's amazing for me to train with, but I love numbers and stricture However, you can train without one fine. It's just different. BMMF the rider in question, from the picture post is at 68kg. So map is low for a pro, but it's not a pro. |
| quote reply |
| | #63 | |
| | Quote:
| |
| quote reply |
| | #65 |
| | Check out Coggan's power profiles. Again, assuming an FTP that's around 85% of MAP, this would give the athlete in question around 5.75W/kg, which is still in the 'worldclass pro' bracket. It's probably not unreasonable to lower all Coggan's figures by 5% for (95% of) pros in the era during which he gathered his data, which would put the king of the castle value at 6.08W/kg, and move 5.75W/kg squarely into the pro (upper) mid-table. |
| quote reply |
| | #66 |
| | I'm still waiting to get on the Olympic research rig at UCLH (work in the research office) more out of interest of what my V02 max is and if there's much point in trying to train/race to a higher level. (currently racign 4hour mtb enduro's) In the mean time, where would you put the upper heart rate as a cut of, I get Vmax is 240 minus age, but I know I can go above this, is it better to slow down at a certina point or let your body decide to slow you down? |
| quote reply |
| | #67 | |
| | Quote:
| |
| quote reply |
| | #72 | |
| | Quote:
From today, three laps of RP: Peak 5 second 211 BPM Peak 10 second 209 BPM Peak 20 second 201 BPM Peak 30 second 192 BPM Peak 60 second 185 BPM | |
| quote reply |
| | #77 |
| | If you set smoothing to 1% then it takes out the 200+ result, maximum it gets to is 199 here: ![]() There's a consistent ramp, rather than a sudden spike which would lead me to think it was hooky- what do you think? EDIT, here's the 211 but, you're right, there is a sudden jump which does look a bit odd: ![]() Last edited by Dammit; 3rd February 2013 at 21:23. |
| quote reply |
| | #78 |
| | Hard to tell from the picture. But under instinct I'd say it was off, as it is an unusually high rate. Not something I think you could achieve in RP. 199 is viable, but you'd know you were there. My max is just shy of 200 and if i'm over 190 i know about it. I did an all out 5min effort the other day, full gas and only got to 192bpm. So 5 shy of my highest ever value. |
| quote reply |
| | #85 | |
| | lol. 211 is crazy. I'm 28 and the most i've ever produced is 196. I was reading this article about Andy Murray's fitness last month (don't ask why - I hate tennis) and it talks of him reaching his peak and acheiving a 200bpm MRH like it's a pretty big deal: Quote:
| |
| quote reply |
| | #86 |
| | I hit well over 220 as a teenager being tested on squat thrusts to exhaustion, and did a ramp test in my late 20s where I was at 192 at the end of the 'warm-up'. Some people are high-beaters, though this doesn't mean you can't achieve a low resting rate (I've recorded 39 - not mind-blowing, but I was definitely aerobically fit at the time). I can't tell you how much pussy I've got discussing this shit at parties. |
| quote reply |
| | #91 |
| | As a runner I always relied on the macmillan running calculator and training by heart rate for planning my interval sessions. Is there a bike equivalent resource that allows you to do this? (e.g. with the Macmillan calculator you can work out your Marathon training paces for intervals, VO2 max, threshold sessions etc from your flat out 5k time). I can't afford a power meter but have an HRM and want to get a bit more scientific.... |
| quote reply |
| | #98 | |
| | Quote:
My resting heartrate is 0.4BPM though that was taken during the 7th of 10 Ironman events in last year's Deca so I'm not sure it's 100% resting. | |
| quote reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Testing | nina | Announcements, Help & Testing | 10 | 25th August 2009 11:02 |
| Testing | cliveo | Announcements, Help & Testing | 8 | 4th October 2008 14:58 |
| Just testing | soulfunk | Announcements, Help & Testing | 2 | 28th August 2008 09:14 |
| Poll testing | Velocio | Announcements, Help & Testing | 7 | 11th June 2007 14:49 |