Avatar for bracketed

bracketed

Member since Oct 2009 • Last active Feb 2016
  • 1 conversations
  • 35 comments

Most recent activity

  • in General
    Avatar for bracketed

    I think that it is often forgotten that there is a legitimate and important retribution aspect to justice. It is not just about deterrence of others and preventing re-offending ("I'm really sorry guv, won't do it again, look how good I've been up until now, hardly killed anybody")

  • in General
    Avatar for bracketed

    ^ Pretty much, yes. Even with video evidence, just refuse to say who was driving.

    Though I understand that the max fine for doing that is £1000 - I have no idea why, given the seriousness of the collision, the guy was only fined £150.

  • in General
    Avatar for bracketed

    Why can't putting in a claim be done online these days.

    It can if you're claiming on Co-op home insurance. As I've just had occasion to find out.

  • in General
    Avatar for bracketed

    Hi,
    My bike has been stolen from my garage in Ewell. It's a white Condor Italia (the one with the curvy frame), with white Shimano RS31 wheels, white bar tape and saddle.
    It was a birthday present from my wife a few years ago, and is my pride and joy.
    I've no illusions about getting it back, but if someone does see it, I'd love to know.

  • in General
    Avatar for bracketed

    I have no evidence as to whether there is any correlation between how fast a cyclist goes and their likelihood of a crash

    Then here's a data point. I've been riding in London at various speeds for 10 years. I have fallen off twice. Once was a clipless moment. Once was going up a dropped kerb that wasn't dropped as much as I thought, in the wet, at a snail's pace. So both my crashes were at considerably less than 5mph.

    Obligatory helmet statement - I wasn't wearing a helmet in either case, and amazingly my head didn't crack like an egg. Possibly didn't even hit the ground - it's rather narrower than my shoulders, perhaps. But it's noteworthy that this is exactly the type of accident a helmet is designed for - low speed fall onto hard surface.

    Oh great, I've commented on the helmet thread. Kill me now.

  • in General
    Avatar for bracketed

    Thought as much, though it annoys me if the police/council had real issues with that section being ridden on then they would have done something about it before, including improved signage. Now they are fining cyclists on the pretence of 'safety' just to make a quick £50. I will now be cycling around the ring road outside of Kingston with the HGV's which i'm sure will be alot safer for me and a lot more convenient for the car drivers as they are stuck behind me.

    Yeah, riding East/West through Kingston is a pain. I lived there until about a year ago. There is a cycle path you can follow by the side of Wood Street - starts at the top of the bus station outside Bentalls, and eventually sends you round Fife Road, from where you can go down Castle Street and onto Eden Street that way. I'm not sure which bits are one-way or two-way, and it's a bit of a faff.

    Or you can go round the other way - the cycle path from John Lewis past the White Stuff, down Union Street, left onto Eden Street and follow it round.

    It would be nice to ride down Clarence Street when it's quiet, but I can't see it being allowed when it's heaving with peds on a Saturday...

  • in General
    Avatar for bracketed

    No it's not, it's on Clarence Street further away from the crossing.

    I meant, the view is that of someone standing on the road, in the crossing. Just to give some positional context to the rest of my post. I realize the sign is behind the crossing, on Clarence Street.

  • in General
    Avatar for bracketed

    Ed's streetview is from a ped Xing, and there's no indication that you can ride a bike on the pavement there.

    A little further round there is a dropped kerb (the entrance to Clarence Street) with a pair of full-size no-entry signs on it.

    A little further round again there is another dropped kerb (the entrance to Castle Street, where you can ride) with a full-size no-entry sign, with an "Except Cycles" underneath it.

    That little sign looks like it's just a reminder. Apart from this, I think it's pretty clear (in this direction at least) that you're not meant to enter Clarence Street from this end on a bike.

    At the other end of Clarence Street, I think you have those empty red circular signs that mean (and say) No Vehicles, which includes bikes. (No Motor Vehicles has a car and a motorbike in the circle). So, as long as you know what the signs mean, it's quite clear that you shouldn't be riding there, I think.

    I wouldn't challenge your FPN. Sorry.

  • in General
    Avatar for bracketed

    Oh it's definitely on a route to work, at least for cyclists - it's on the main commuter track from Richmond Park to central London. When I lived in Kingston, there was more than one occasion when it would have been useful to have found it open as I passed, but it rarely was.

Actions